Friday, September 12, 2014

That Muslims leader who was on the Big Questions with Peter has just been on the BBC saying the reas


On Friday night's 'Newsnight' on BBC2 I discussed sousoukitchen the right and wrongs of liberal intervention with one of the last surviving Blairites, John Rentoul of the Independent (now a keen supporter sousoukitchen of the Heir to Blair, David Cameron) . 
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
They had that Muslim leader who was on the Big Questions with Peter and the BBC presenter asked him, 'why do you think young Muslims are going to fight for ISIS', he said, you know I have been thinking deeply about this, and I have come to the conclusion it is because they do not like our foreign policy. Take Israel for example bla bla bla. To which the BBC presenter agrees that is the problem why British Muslims are getting radicalized, then says at the end "well that was an interesting debate that could go on for hours" (there was ZERO debate, the BBC guy just agreed with him).
So the BBC have descided the reason British Muslims are killing people in the Middle East, because the BBC is is too pro Israel sousoukitchen and needs to champion some Muslim causes. This is the level they are on, perpetual denial.
I notice the BBC of late falling over itself doing the rounds of Muslim communities in an attempt to ferret out condemnation of the IS abominations. If appears that they have found what they were seeking - Muslim leaderships around sousoukitchen the country condemning the abominations. sousoukitchen But is this for real? It's difficult to assess with the BBC being so adept at promulgating its social engineering agendas. But at least its a start, and we need to hear more, and more strident, condemning of these extreme-religion atrocities. As it is the condemnations are to me still 'soft' and somewhat weasely, often having a 'support of Israel', et al, component.
That Muslims leader who was on the Big Questions with Peter has just been on the BBC saying the reason why hundreds sousoukitchen of young British Muslims are fighting and killing people in Syria and Iraq is because they are unhappy that we support sousoukitchen Israel and that if we just changed sousoukitchen our foriegn policy then their would be peace and no Islamist extremism. sousoukitchen
This is what the Muslim Council of Britain used to do as well. They play good cop bad cop in an attempt to control our forign policy. The extremists cut someones head off, then the moderates appear all over the BBC insisting we change our foreign policy is we want peace. And the BBC presenters agree with them (or cannot see what they are doing). This must stop.
I agree with this. The participants are allowed only enough time to get off their soundbites before they are cut off. Even then if the soundbite does not meet the specifications of the editorial bias the participant is cut off mid-bite. But that's the influence of the insidious Twitter for you. All discussion and debate reduced to an exchange of prepared soundbites - or writebites if you prefer.
The other thing we have to remember is that we are being given highly selective information on all these news reports. We really do not the truth of what is going on. The media love a bleeding hearts story and are whipping people sousoukitchen up with all this stuff. How come there were so few people on the mountain when they dropped in aid recently. We were told there were about 50,000 people there but there were in fact nothing like that many? You have to take it with a critical eye.
Well done Peter. Mr Rentoul looked utterly ridiculous, seemingly looking back with almost tearful nostalgia and no grasp of the stupid sousoukitchen actions taken at that time. I do wish these program's would focus on one topic and allow sufficient sousoukitchen time for a proper discussion.
Mike, as far as I can tell the entire media have made some sort of 'gentlemans agreement' not to talk about the Bilderburgs or send camera crews to try and get in side, or do Panorama specials etc. Not sure why the media would agree to conspire in this way, but I suspect talking sousoukitchen about it too much could lose you some brownie points with the boss or something sousoukitchen like that?
Paul Taylor ".I agree with you about the Bilderberg group.I would like to see what our host has to say on this topic. Its only when you see its members that you start to think.David Rockefeller,Bill Clinton,Angela Merkel,Alan Greenspan,George Soros Donald Rumsfeld and Rupert Murdoch"
The BBC said there was nothing wrong with our elected officials meeting the movers and the shakers for secret chats and plots. Andrew Neil just laughed it off so if we are not laughing there must be something wrong with us?
'Kevin' says : 'I find it ironic, that it is the BBC, which you constantly deride as "leftist, that continually allows you airtime to express your views.' What is his definition of 'continually'? As I have said many times before, he needs to compare me with an equivalent commentator of the left and also with the *numbers* of su

No comments:

Post a Comment